Ghassulians: The Ancient Jesuits
I used to think that the Jesuits overall represented the Catholic Church; not necessarily. Other Catholic orders like the Knights of Malta don't seem to be friends. But the Jesuits are the highest of the military order, and their power took time to take over. Like in They Live, they seem to be some group of overseers that slowly inject themselves into society wherever it fits.
So the question should be asked, has this same group existed under different names throughout history, before the 1500s when they were founded? I think the answer is an absolute yes. And I think there are ways to find out exactly who they were for each generation.
On September 27th, 1540 (the same day Google celebrates their birthday), the Jesuits were recognized by the Catholic Church by Pope Paul III, who was originally named Alessandro Farnese. It's theorized for this reason that the House of Farnese may have been one of the original families behind the Jesuits.
I think a more interesting theory is actually about the Borgia family, though. There is a theory that Jesuits' 3rd Superior General, Francis Borgia, was the real founder, and that Ignatius of Loyola was just a front man. The Borgia family were named after a town called Borja, which was in the Kingdom of Aragon.
I try to avoid talk about the esoteric, but because these people seem to follow kabbalistic traditions like Gematria, I noticed that the word Aragon is 56 in Simple English Gematria. As I've discussed before, the number 56 seems to be an important number to these Jesuits.
Aragon was originally a small county, and eventually became a kingdom as one part of an area called the Crown of Aragon. This was all within the east side of the land we call Spain of today. But if you look into the Crown of Aragon, such as what can currently be seen on the Wikipedia page, they wrote the Book of the Consulate of the Sea. They appeared to write the most important legal code for Commercial Law at the time, which is generally assumed to mean the same thing as Maritime Law: the law of the sea.
We're often taught that the government, or the law, are evil. In reality, it's that these groups such as the Jesuits are the real ones running from the law. They have set normal life up to avoid the Common Law, the law of the land, where real freedom is found. These laws have never gone away, especially in America. But due to their intentional gatekeeping, we just aren't taught about how often we put ourselves within the jurisdiction of Commercial Law, which is what almost all the courts, roads, and other public parts of society are founded upon.
In court, people are usually in a position where they are assumed to be the agents of their Birth Certificate, and are recognized as "U.S. Citizens" instead of as Nationals of the land, which is our more natural identity. So the way they get you is not necessarily by being corrupt, but by just using this tricky language to make you act on behalf of pieces of paper that are connected to your name. As for what to do to protect yourself, I think there are ways, but I don't claim to know everything about that.
But what I've realized is that if you want to follow the trail of human sin, you follow the commerce. Follow the sea. As Marcus Tullius Cicero said,
"Inter arma enim silent leges" (In times of war, the law falls silent).
These people are constantly finding ways to avoid the law, and in part, that's why they like keeping all forms of "war" happening. Some say commerce itself is war. When you're out at sea, that's where you can't live with a simple law of the land.
So in other words, these Jesuits, or this gang of overseers, have always made sure to be the ones on top of the Commerce. It's where human sin manifests, and it's where war and confusion happens.
In the Vatican State today, there is a corporation called UNIDROIT. They run the Uniform Commercial Code, so it is pretty straight forward who runs the Commerce today. In fact, there is an even older group called the Uniform Law Commission that technically first created the UCC, and to this day it strives to buddy up with all sorts of politicians, making sure this code stays intact. So back then, it was no different. Their UCC was simply the Book of the Consulate of the Sea.
Back in 4500-3300 BC, we had the start of the Copper, or Chalcolithic Age. This was perhaps the earliest known time in human history where commerce began. It was the end of the Stone Age; where the age of just being hunters and gatherers had evolved. People were first starting to create tools and objects; things of value that could be traded between other civilizations and tribes.
But one group that entered the communities of people at this time were called the Ghassulians. They came from a land called Teleilat el-Ghassul, which was a land in the east of the Jordan Valley and at the edge of the Dead Sea.
.jpg)
This copper sceptre likely came from their culture.
It was in the early 1900s, when the entire archaeological excavation, as it happens, was overseen and "discovered" by Jesuits. This excavation was originally led by Father Alexis Mallon, and passed on to other Jesuits.
There is a theory that Venice, the place that used to be the largest Maritime Republic, full of hundreds of royal families as the center of commerce, was a continuation of the Phoenicians (from the Iron Age), who were in turn a continuation of the Canaanites (from the Bronze Age). The terminology of the "Canaan" (or Kanaan, with a K) sounds oddly similar to the Catholic's Canon Law that we have today.
But it's not just this connection that makes me think they were the Jesuits. It's also one of the few pieces of artwork they left behind.
This double-crossed star is the exact same symbol that has been theorized to be Mark of Cain. Tupper Saussy was the first person to point out how this symbol seemed to appear along with the Jesuits in his book, Rulers of Evil. It can be found in numerous places in the Holy See, on CERN's Hadron Collider, Harvard Law's doors, and more. It may be a simple looking symbol, but I think there is indication that some of these people see it as a signature from God to allow them to rule over evil.
The claim is that in the book of Genesis, when God gave Cain the privilege to rule over evil, and that people who slay Cain will be punished seven-fold, that it was a claim that God wants a group to rule over the other evil. So in a sense, these people could be fulfilling a certain type of divine privilege for those who refuse to follow basic humanist behavior like the Common Law. This is all under the assumption that there is a physical mark to begin with.
Whether this story really began with Cain and Abel, or whether it was based off of Annu and Marduk, I don't know. But there appear to be similarities in some of these stories. On top of this, the mark appears to usually be associated with the ruler of evil having a sword and a shield as well.
As it happens, Sam Hyde is one of the only people I've seen make a post directly about this symbol.
There's also someone named Damien At Hope who put together this diagram showing this symbol with certain leaders throughout the ages. Again, the Ghassulians being the earliest known ones. I think this simple symbol is one they really don't want us to know about, and one that represents who the commerce is led by.
The Catholics have often also redefined the Virgin Mary as synonymous with Lucifer, which is why they named the main two states they colonized in America after her (Virginia and Maryland). And in their territory likes Washington, D.C., where the Capitol has a portrait, painted by Constantino Brumidi from Rome, showing the Virgin Mary with a sword and shield.