Why Prof. Jiang is Not Controlled Opposition

As usual, the YouTubers have got it all figured out, folks. A man who talks about secret societies and gets millions of views is a fraud, and whatever he said needs to be perceived with caution.

I myself have a tendency to accuse people of this a lot of the time... But I would say what matters more than views these days is what tribe they're a part of. What communities have the most influence and meaning to people? In fact, what puzzles me about why people have a problem with Jiang, is how quickly they are willing to attack his character before his actual ideas. A lot of people these days have an ego-based urge to just feel like they're "on top" of all the info, and are afraid of looking like suckers who fell for a scam artist of some kind.

I think a lot of the conspiracy theorists online these days seem to care more about feeling like they're in some kind of "the know" instead of wanting to satisfy their urge to learn and make sense of things. They say things like "it all just leads back to aliens and we can't do anything about it," or some over the top generalization like that. But I think if we are humans of this world, it's our responsibility to try and understand and discuss the real politics of these group as well.

Like Jiang, I have my own opinions of certain groups that I believe rule other groups. He seems to believe particularly in how followers of Jacob Frank are the true group that is moving behind the scenes. I personally am unsure about this theory myself, and think people are paying too much attention to Israel. I believe the main group that has used these other groups to divert attention from itself have been the Jesuits. But either way, I think Jiang and myself are both more honest people just trying to learn. Not just people trying to always say "I know what's on top."

I personally learned about him around the end of last year like a lot of others, and spent some good hours listening to his lectures. One thing I liked about him in particular was that "facts" and the history were only part of what he liked discussing.

Part of what Professor Jiang tells his students is that the significance of holy scripture such as the Bible is at foremost poetry, explaining to people how literature and the arts are what shape the world, as they are what shape our languages and interpretation of everything.

He doesn't just care about the feeling of having the facts. He cares about human purpose and spiritual evolution, describing our higher identities as the divine spark within us that our bodies don't directly show. He's said things that indicate that he's not trying to be a part of one tribe in terms of religion or whatnot. He understands that we have purposes in this world that involve creating things that are valuable beyond the physical realm. As well as analyzing the meaning behind different books of the bible, or even studying more controversial books like the Gospel of Thomas.

I particularly liked his lecture on Modernism and Individualism, and how he explains the problems with those two ideologies. It particularly started in the early 1900s, and there appeared to be a mysterious ambush creeping up on every department of society, such as changing the ideal style of literature, the birth of "Psychologists," and a publicization of everything we consume.

He talks about how authors that scholars often praise, like James Joyce and Virginia Woolf, wrote books that were not designed to be enjoyed be a normal reader the way most classic poetry is. They're books that are considered to be "great" because they make so many complex references to other old books, and that the reader should be required to do vast amounts of research to actually understand them. This leads to this belief that we should be respecting these authors as if they're geniuses, when in reality they're not giving anything meaningful to the readers the way a lot of authors previously wrote.

James Joyce went to two Jesuit Universities, and would often praise other books, only to perhaps stab the true authors behind the back by trying to take away what was valuable about them. And the fact that he was friends with a similar author who's name was Virginia raises red flags as well, given that the state of Virginia is Jesuit territory, and that the Catholics use the Virgin Mary as a symbol of Lucifer.

To the Lighthouse = 75 in Ordinal Reduction.

Same as Ignatius of Loyola (the founding Black Pope) and Lorenzo Ricci (Black Pope who lead the American Revolution).

Ironically, one of the authors he claimed to like, Fyodor Dostoevsky, tried to warn people about these Modernist ideas that were creeping up around the end of his life. At the end of his book, The Brothers Karamazov, he writes a lot about the hypocrisies of psychologists and how they don't really know how to judge people. They can only look at things from one dense angle.

I'm not saying that all of that is bad, but Individualism and Modernism are in my view basically another work for Ayn Rand's Objectivist ideology, and it's the kind of ideology a lot of the technocrats and entrepreneurs that were so vocal a few years ago were all preaching so much.

I used to spend a lot of time in crypto groups, and as you might guess, that is basically the ideology of most people who are into crypto. And while there are some exceptions, I think the majority of people who are so into crypto like I used to be are very selfish and are simply people who have lost sight of their personal purpose. On top of this, they are often very susceptible to social media and as a result, they start expressing their exaggerate beliefs about AI... And then they profit off of AI investments, which reinforces their delusional beliefs, and then they spread that belief to more people, and the ugly cycle goes on and on.

Not to get too deeply into that topic, but while most people have probably realized by now that AI was mostly just hype, there are some people out there that just don't get it. And I think it's overall due to their inability to see outside of material value.

These people are particularly attached to that idea of Individualism. They always talk about things like the government as if it's the enemy, and that they can fight fire with fire with more capitalism; get away from the system with Bitcoin or whatever coin, and run off into blue yonder.

The Constitution of the United States starts with We the People. This means that we are the government; we just aren't taught that way. And I find that most of the time when you look at how "corrupt" groups act, they are not always breaking the law; they just understand and follow the rules. The idea that we are alone against this evil government is one of the Jesuit's favorite plays.

The rose is also a masonic symbol of initiation.

A Jesuit once said that The Catcher in the Rye is a book that you should read over and over again, as that was a foundational book on the ideology of rebellion. Just like the premise of that cringey movie, V for Vendetta, where the main character is basically the direct celebration of the Jesuit, Guy Fawkes.

The concept we have of fighting against a government, or even other examples, like how when we pay off debts, we think we are paying off "our" debts. Usually it's actually that our Birth Certificates, which only mark a corporate entity with your same name. The human self is actually the Secured Party Creditor. I'm not claiming to be an expert on that subject, but there is a reoccurring theme that occurs in our delusions of our "Individual Citizen" selves. It's a form of self sacrifice. Like Cecil DeMille said,

"It is impossible for us to break the law. We can only break ourselves against the law."

But if these critics are willing to admit that conspiracy theorists can be controlled opposition as well, then they should make sure they are tested to those same standards.

There is a channel that's very popular with a lot of the AI/Crypto people right now called Hidden AmuraKa. I've noticed that a lot of these obsessive "run away from government" privacy nuts such as Mental Outlaw, Eric Murphy, Denshi, or others, almost all participate in this sub-culture I find rather annoying, where it's always the same style of meme-art in the thumbnails. A perfect little subculture for a controlled opposition figure to infiltrate by mimicking such behavior, as this Hidden AmuraKa guy does. It's one of those little things that unconsciously gives the viewer a nod, like "We're on your side!" "We're not trying to please any corporation here!"

And sometimes I've seen good content from those channels. There was once a crypto related chat server I ended up in where once I unintentionally garnered support from the leader of the group because I posted a Luke Smith video that had that style of thumbnail. Yet interestingly enough, this same person once deleted a video I posted from Professor Jiang. And yes, the leader, as well as multiple in that group had expressed how they were supporters of the Hidden AmuraKa channel.

Ironically, coming from a YouTuber who studies numerology, his name goes exactly to 56 in Ordinal Reduction, which as I've explained in previous articles, is the number of the Jesuits. If you search Freemason, or the number 33, you'll get all sorts of videos of his contributing the the current trend of obsessing over Freemasonry... but Jesuits? 56? Oddly not. So yeah, I'm not making any exact statements, but to me this channel seems like a textbook example of controlled opposition.

This user is also openly a sponsor for Metalicus Blockchain, which is one of those crypto that has a cult-like following. It's usually associated with Proton/XPR. I'm not making any statement about how well or badly those could do as investments, but I do find it strange that a channel that tries to tell people about how to make sense of world events is telling people to invest in something at all; I think that is some weird fear-based propaganda by default... But try explaining that to one of these dipshits that believes cryptos are the only savior toward our tokenized economy. In other words, just their voluntary self sacrifice and enslavement to the cult of individualism.

The creator of these two crypto projects, Marshall Hayner, has spent the past few years being another Elon Musk bootlicker who likes to make heroic sounding esoteric tweets. Metallicus Blockchain ($METAL) also has a total supply of 666,666,666.

Another idea I've heard a lot of the people bring up these days is the idea that "Satan is actually good, because our matrix was created by bad guys." Okay, but it could also just be that Satanists are bad.

I think the reason some of these people have been suckered into following channels like this is use their personal greed for money to distract them from other interesting stories about hidden technology. While they keep deluding themselves about AGI being right on the corner, David Wilcock recently died after having spoken about missing scientists that spoke about Anti-Gravity technology. I don't know much about Anti-Gravity, but it could be.

But from what I've seen, these personal attacks on his character, such as how he went to Yale University, do not hold up as ideas of him being controlled opposition. People often mention Yale because of Skull and Bones, but they never bring up the Jesuit universities the presidents have been to like Georgetown and Fordham, both of which the Trump family members have attended.

But like I implied above, I think being distracted by these Jesuits like Hidden AmuraKa is just some people's natural consequence due to their greed for money and inability to get off the internet. If you ask me, those behaviors demonstrate one of the most harmful cults within itself, while Professor Jiang's ideals are based off of creativity and love. I know which one I'd rather be with.

[ Reply ]