Sam Hyde = Jesuit?

Following my article on Charls Carroll, as well as my video discussing the signs of this, I've still been thinking about whether MDE are run by Jesuits with a certain agenda.

Cudos to Charls Carroll for... sort of responding to my article.

Instead of just looking at it in the sense of a certain group, I think I should just start off by saying that this kind of influence group, especially Sam Hyde, might have a literal authoritative power when he makes some of his public statements.

The main thing that gets me thinking this is his Dear Elon video.

I don't think this video was just a message to support his community; it may have been an actual lawful order Elon received under one of his bosses, and this video was just one form of it.

It's overall a stance on why we shouldn't be looking at things like social progress and AI from a quantitative perspective all the time, and how that is linked to letting into too many immigrants who are messing up the quality of the average American.

It's interesting how at one point, he literally describes Rome and Babylon as "great nations..." I was a little surprised about that, given that the Catholic Papacy is the continuation of the Roman system.

At the same time though, the Jesuits appear to have, at least on the surface, a more liberal stance on immigration, supporting it. The Superior General, Arturo Sosa, has publicly denounced Trump's deportation policies over the past decade.

But I can't exactly say these people are known for their honesty. It could be a part of their learning against learning methods.

On top of this, I think Sam Hyde made a particularly similar statement to the Jesuits' thoughts on society and how "most people are just bad."

And after making statements like that, he and his friends have said things like "I see why politicians do what they do," justifying their actions by means of the bad things the citizens do, too.

In the official Jesuit magazine, America, there was an article where someone wrote when describing the way the United States was founded:

The framers wanted to build a "novus ordo" that would secure "liberty and justice for all"... The underlying principle of this new order is the fact of human sin. To build a republic designed for sinners, then, is the indispensable task.... There is no use building a social system for saints. There are too few of them. And those there are are impossible to live with!... Any effective social system must therefore be designed for the only moral majority there is: sinners.

This is the same mentality that Sam Hyde says he believes in, and he says it with quite an understanding.

Let's also dive into his famous antisemitism, as antisemitism has risen more and more throughout the years along with the rise of hatred for Isreal.

My general opinion on Israel is basically this: The Jews in the bible, and the Jewish identity in general should not be compared to Israel in the slightest. Unfortunately, it is likely that almost all actual "Jews" were wiped out.

There is an interesting rumor that Japan, particularity its predominant Yamato Clan are actually half Jewish, and were people over the 12 Tribes that escaped to there and cross-bred.

On top of this, some of the stereotypes, such as Jews owning the banks, just don't add up. The main reason is probably because of the Rothschild family, but Rothschild actually sounds like the two German words (Rot + Schild) that make up the term Red Shield, which is a catholic term. The founder of the Rothchilds as well as his children were all members of the Knights of Malta; the first Catholic military order. They have always been catholic; just happen to be Israeli as well.

But the question should then be brought up: Who are the people truly behind the power coming into Israel? I would say in my opinion it is two possibilities: Either the Jacob Frankists who follow his philosophy of Pax Judaica, or it could be that that group is now one and the same with the Catholic church. Some theorize that the Frankists took over the Jesuits; and some vice versa.

The Frankists are one of the many satanic-like groups of people who appear to have Jewish routes, but are anything but Jewish if you understand their actual beliefs.

They originated a lot of the sexual abuse and corruption that came into things like the perverse studies of Sigmund Freud which our psychological industry is still mostly based around today. These people believe that it's a good thing to sin, believing it to be a freedom from our world.

But I am wondering right now if perhaps we're seeing a war between the two. The Roman Catholics behind the scenes may be satanic and awful too, however at least they are the ones that have always seemed to set the ground rules for our little matrix we live in. I believe that is why they founded out society off of Abrahamic religions.

So in other words, a lot of these esoteric secret societies I think are created as an attempt for people to free themselves from the matrix that the Catholics keep in place with their limiting beliefs.

Of course, in order for the them to fight them, they have infiltrated and controlled most of these secret societies all the time; such as Freemasonry or Illuminatti; some of which they probably controlled from the very beginning.

I think both sides are wrong; they are circle jerking each other. The truth is, we need freedom but we also need the corrupt governing power that the Jesuits run because people like Sam Hyde are right when they say most people are sinners. We will continue to have this circle jerk as long as humanity continues living.

Will that mean more surveillance and control in the future? It could be, but frankly I don't think that's gonna be all bad. There are still a lot of messed up people out there, and they have to manage them somehow.

What if the real reason behind Sam's antisemitism is to serve the Jesuits' intention to fight against Pax Judaica? He's just the member of one bad group, but a bad group fighting another bad one. And if calling them Jews is what they have to do in order to give these Frankists a hard time, maybe that's what they believe in.

Either that, or again, they could be on the same side.

I believe what may happen is similar to what Professor Jiang says about the future. Power will continue to slowly go to Israel as it rises as one of the biggest nations, and people, as a result, will get more and more angry, and more and more misguided by antisemitism.

As a result of this, not only will this assist in the Catholic Church's love for religious divisiveness, but more importantly, it will help play out what the book of Revelations may have been designed to do: Bring them to the "good" side. And with Sam's whole "Romans are good" stance, it is worth thinking about.

What I mean by this is that people will see Israel as the bad guys, and then the Catholic Church will come and say "Hey guys, we know they're evil. Come support us and we'll fight them together!"

This is the dangerous future that they want. And if you follow it, you'll either be supporting the same side, or just supporting the opposite side of one coin.

Christianity has become so popular over the past few years on the internet, but I don't think many of them actually sit down and think about what sects of it they should trust, or what their idea of an accurate bible is. It's a complex question but one of the important questions to discuss.

Am I saying that I disagree with all of these opinions he's expressed? No. I actually believe that a lot of these beliefs are true, and that the Jesuits may be the best option we have for a social order compared to the other corrupt groups. But if you want to live a good life, I wouldn't recommend participating in that war of power.

Overall, I really do like him, and I think he truly makes a lot of great commentary on politics and creativity. Jesuit or not, I support Sam Hyde and his show for now. But always be vigilant in case somebody is trying to get you to play along with their "side."

[ Reply ]